NHTSA seeks comment on whether the warning should be visible to the driver, the rear passenger(s), or both. [Found in the docket for this ANPRM.]. The seat belt and/or occupant detection sensors utilized by the rear warning system in vehicles with removable rear seats are intentionally disconnected. The signal may also potentially prevent children from unbuckling their seat belts. Although it is of no doubt that the use of seatbelt reduces the incidence and severity of MVC-induced TLJ injury, how it is protective for front-seat occupants of an automobile after rollover crashes is unclear. The third report summarized and extended the analyses from the previous two reports. g. (NH4)2CO3\left(\mathrm{NH}_4\right)_2 \mathrm{CO}_3(NH4)2CO3 Euro NCAP uses a five-star safety rating system to help consumers, their families and businesses compare vehicles more easily and to help them identify the safest choice for their needs. Minimum duration. [22] Most currently-produced vehicles also have a seat belt warning for the front outboard passenger seat, although FMVSS No. Authority has been delegated to NHTSA. Please identify comments by the number with which the relevant topic is associated in this document. [11] You may read the comments received by the docket at the address given above under ADDRESSES. 0000016204 00000 n corresponding official PDF file on govinfo.gov. These measurements come from FMVSS No. and buses with a GVWR of 3,855 kg (8,500 lb) or less and an unloaded weight less than or equal to 2,495 kg (5,500 lb). 99. DOT HS 812 594). 22. 0000047389 00000 n DOT HS 811 097. Occupant detection systems are practical for the front outboard passenger seating position, as that passenger seat is not typically subject to as many of the potential complications to occupant detection posed by rear seats (such as large occupants spanning multiple seating positions). b) convicted of reckless driving three times in one year, Florida Traffic School Online (4-Hour BDI) Ex, Earth - why was it created, what's its purpos, Fundamentals of Engineering Economic Analysis, David Besanko, Mark Shanley, Scott Schaefer, Introduction to Chemical Engineering Thermodynamics, Hendrick Van Ness, J.M. 0000028314 00000 n With respect to audible warnings, we seek comment on the following: 17. For systems without occupant Start Printed Page 51080detection, the visual signal must clearly indicate to the driver which seat belts are in use and not in use. 0000019826 00000 n [57] 0000190039 00000 n 19. FMVSS No. [19], The standard currently requires a seat belt warning for the driver's seat belt on passenger cars;[20] U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Many vehicle manufacturers subsequently implemented enhanced seat belt warnings for the driver and front outboard passenger seating positions. 25. 76. 0000012756 00000 n 0000046752 00000 n Unbelted vehicle occupants reach 0 mph by striking the windshield, steering column and dashboard. Modern vehicles are designed to crush when they crash to absorb kinetic energy. Even with modern cars that are designed to absorb the energy of impact, a head-on collision may have more energy than the car design can dissipate. With respect to potential requirements for a visual rear seat belt warning, NHTSA seeks comment on the following: 13. 0000063736 00000 n 2 Of the children who were killed in a crash, 38% were not buckled up. :Z_. [28] Web(SHSP) is to reach zero fatalities. DOT 2007 Acceptability Study, supra, pp. Fifteen-passenger vans are classified as buses because they are designed for carrying more than ten persons. 102. 208 requirement.[36]. For example, would an audible notification (e.g., a chime) indicating that a rear-seat occupant had buckled the belt effectively inform the driver (or facilitate the driver in determining) whether there were any unbuckled rear-seat occupants? 208 does not require this. The current driver's belt warning requirements specify that a belt is not in use when, at the option of the manufacturer, either the seat belt latch mechanism is not fastened or the belt is not extended at least 10.16 centimeters (cm) (4 inches (in)) from its stowed position. This information is not part of the official Federal Register document. These included warning systems that had only the minimum features required by FMVSS No. You should _______ your following distance as your visibility decreases as the weather gets worse. If NHTSA were to propose requirements for a warning that is similar to existing seat belt warnings, should the warning be visual-only (e.g., a telltale displaying text or icons), audio-only, or audio-Start Printed Page 51083visual? Akamatsu, M., Hashimoto, H., and Shimaoka, S., Assessment Method of Effectiveness of Passenger Seat Belt Reminder, SAE Technical Paper 2012-01-0050, 2012, doi:10.4271/2012-01-0050. ECE Regulation No. 0000003170 00000 n 87. For example, would a less sophisticated warning, such as a specialized system of mirrors, be sufficient to inform the driver about the status of the rear seat belts? Having an audible or longer-duration visual warning activate for an unoccupied seat (such as might be the case if the system did not have occupant detection) could be a nuisance for the driver and might either desensitize the occupants to the Start Printed Page 51084warning signal, or lead them to circumvent or defeat the system. If the change of status occurs below 25 km/h and no doors are opened, the signal may be delayed until the vehicle has been in motion for 500 meters. NHTSA, therefore, seeks comment on the potential benefits and costs of the different types of rear seat belt warning system discussed in this notice, including those that provide a warning similar to the kinds of seat belt warnings that are provided in current-production vehicles in the United States or elsewhere in the world, as well as other potentially novel approaches. Because of the low prevalence and limited history with rear seat belt warnings, NHTSA has limited direct data on the effectiveness of rear seat belt warnings. NHTSA-2010-0061-0002. What minimum length of time would be sufficient to capture the driver's (or passenger's) attention for the rear seat belt warning, without becoming a distraction or nuisance for the driver (or passenger)? WebFor the optimization with the unbelted driver, only the 0 condition was used as a constraint in the optimization. As it continues with the proceeding required to be initiated by MAP-21, NHTSA seeks comment on a variety of issues related to amending FMVSS No. at 31202(a)(2) (repealing portion of 49 U.S.C. Occupant restraint use in 2017: Results from the NOPUS controlled intersection study (Report No. Using a seat belt is one of the most effective actions a motor vehicle occupant can take to prevent death and injury in a crash. Explain why the water at geysers and some springs is hot. 24. developer tools pages. Active protection refers to features, such as manual seat belts, that require action by the occupant, while passive protection, sometimes called automatic protection, refers to safety features that do not require any action by the occupant other than sitting in a designated seating position. If commenters believe that a proposed seat belt warning system would not meet the requirements and considerations of 49 U.S.C. 6. Collisions on city streets are largely at intersections because of lane changing, running or jumping lights. Euro NCAP introduced SBRS bonus points in 2002. 208 in 1974 to require that only the driver seating position be equipped with a seat belt warning system providing a visual and audible warning, with the audible warning not lasting longer than eight seconds. What type of information should the warning convey? awards points for front and rear seat belt reminder systems (SBRSs) as part of their Safety Assist score. Should the system be required to register small children that would presumably be placed in a child restraint system? 32. MAP-21 contains two provisions regarding seat belt warning systems. A problem with false reminders is that they can lead occupants to disregard or attempt to circumvent the system, defeating the purpose of such systems. We will consider all comments received before the close of business on the comment closing date indicated above under DATES. 0000003404 00000 n %%EOF provide legal notice to the public or judicial notice to the courts. European New Car Assessment Programme Assessment ProtocolSafety Assist, 3.3.2. Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns, and suggest alternatives. Transportation Research Board Study, supra, pp. We also seek comment on whether any vehicles within the broad applicability criteria should be exempt. NHTSA also seeks comment on the technological and economic feasibility of alternative rear seat belt warning systems. better and aid in comparing the online edition to the print edition. See Docket Nos. Webpassenger using both unbelted 5th percentile female and unbelted 50th percentile male dummies in the rigid barrier crash tests at 30-mph. Unbelted rear seat passengers pose a serious threat to the driver and other vehicle occupants, as well as themselves. This does not include respondents who indicated that they never drive. Operation of vehicle without approved material in windows. This is based on the data maintained in their Highway Loss Data Institute, Vehicle Information Database. [49] 0000047012 00000 n Upon receiving your comments, Docket Management will return the postcard by mail. 16, Revision 9 8.4.3.3 and 8.4.4.5; European New Car Assessment Programme Assessment ProtocolSafety Assist, 3.1.5. In addition, you should submit a copy, from which you have deleted the claimed confidential business information, to the docket at the address given above under ADDRESSES. If a visual warning system including a telltale were to be required, should NHTSA propose requirements for telltale characteristics, and if so, what should they be? Only 66 percent of people who said they always wore seat belts while driving also said they always wore them as rear seat passengers. First, it repeals the statutory provision that prohibited NHTSA from requiring or specifying as a compliance option an audible seat belt warning lasting longer than 8 seconds. You may review DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published on April 11, 2000, (Volume 65, Number 70; Pages 19477-78) or you may visit http://www.dot.gov/privacy.html. Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21), Public Law 112-141 (2012). If your shoulder restraints keep hitting you in the ear or in the neck, consult your owners manual on how to adjust the the height of the safety belts. 35. 208 to require a seat belt warning system for rear seats on passenger cars and multipurpose passenger vehicles (MPVs) with a gross vehicle weight rating (GVWR) of 4,536 kilograms (10,000 pounds) or less. B.) 6. Should whether the warning is visual or audible depend on when the warning is given and what it is for (e.g., a visual warning at the beginning of the trip and an audible warning during the trip if a buckled belt becomes unfastened)? We also seek comment on balancing effectiveness with costs, technological feasibility, and acceptability. that agencies use to create their documents. The city of Provo in Utah, tats-Unis, has 44 public charging station ports (Level 2 and Level 3) within 15km. The 2004 Transportation Research Board Report on technologies to increase seat belt use observed that, while limited, the data available to date provide strongly converging evidence in support of both the potential effectiveness and consumer acceptance of many new seat belt use technologies[. Should it also depend on the recipient of the warning (for example, driver versus rear passenger)? 30111,[43] i?J?C$If 'QHv3Sl1. 208, as well as twenty different enhanced warning systems. Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. 0000005625 00000 n [48] Please note that even after the comment closing date, we will continue to file relevant information in the docket as it becomes available. 16. Seat belts protect occupants in various ways. Mazda and Ford introduced rear seat belt reminders in MY 2018 and 2019, respectively.

Allied Property Management Longview, Tx, Assetto Corsa Bosozoku, Articles U