/P 10 0 R /Pg 15 0 R /Pg 13 0 R /P 10 0 R /K [2] /P 10 0 R /K [11] /Type /StructElem << endobj Nevertheless, as support for its general conclusions, the Fourth District relied on cases involving the discovery of social media materials beyond photographs. 74 0 obj /Pg 13 0 R /S /P /S /P /S /P 233 0 obj << >> /Type /StructElem /Contents [360 0 R 361 0 R 362 0 R] 0000000016 00000 n Not surprisingly, many plaintiffs now object to any discovery requests seeking social media information on grounds including overbreadth, vagueness and violation of the right to privacy. << /Pg 18 0 R /Pg 19 0 R /K [11] 17 [192 0 R 193 0 R 194 0 R 195 0 R 196 0 R 197 0 R 198 0 R 199 0 R 200 0 R 201 0 R] << /K [23] 16 [178 0 R 179 0 R 180 0 R 181 0 R 292 0 R 183 0 R 184 0 R 185 0 R 186 0 R 187 0 R startxref endobj << RESPONSE TO FORM INTERROGATORY NO. /Pages 6 0 R >> The interrogatory also seeks attorney work-product in violation of Code of Civil Procedure sections 2018.020 and 2018.030. 261 0 obj /P 476 0 R /Pg 30 0 R endobj << /S /P xb```f`` |@1X t+]HX7r-=rL * ) 3XZ${KKo& << /Pg 34 0 R /K [8] 256 0 obj 72 41 185 0 obj /Parent 6 0 R 1 0 obj /Names [(Note 1) 35 0 R (Note 2) 36 0 R] /S /P 293 0 obj >> /P 10 0 R /P 10 0 R /P 10 0 R /K [462 0 R] /P 472 0 R /Type /StructElem endobj << /K [3] >> endobj /S /LBody 180 0 obj /Resources 423 0 R 78 0 obj >> /Type /StructElem /P 474 0 R /K [1] /Type /StructElem /P 473 0 R /P 473 0 R 3.1: /K [0] /Pg 31 0 R endobj /Pg 13 0 R /S /P >> 185 0 R 186 0 R 187 0 R 188 0 R 189 0 R 190 0 R 191 0 R 192 0 R 193 0 R 194 0 R Importantly, the Fourth District only contemplated still images in Nucci because they were the subject of the discovery dispute. Subject to and without waiving >> Specific objections should be matched to specific requests. >> /Pg 13 0 R /Type /StructElem /Pg 22 0 R >> << 171 0 obj /S /LBody /Type /StructElem /S /L /Type /StructElem /Pg 16 0 R endobj /S /P 0000001696 00000 n << <>stream Specific Objections All objections to discovery requests must be specific. /Pg 34 0 R /S /P Notably, the Fourth District held that, generally, photographs on a social networking site are not privileged, nor are they protected by any right of privacy, regardless of the privacy settings a user elects to establish on their account. >> 294 0 obj 69 0 obj /S /P 163 0 obj << One of the first cases defense attorneys should rely . endobj 285 0 obj /K [7] /K [8] /S /P 286 0 obj /K [9] /StructParents 14 >> /Type /StructElem /Pg 29 0 R /P 10 0 R /Annots [] 125 0 obj /Pg 17 0 R 19 [212 0 R 213 0 R 214 0 R] << /Contents [330 0 R 331 0 R 332 0 R] /Type /StructElem /P 10 0 R /S /Span /S /L 320 0 obj >> 107 0 obj <> endobj *Joey is an associate in our Orlando, Florida office who can be reached at 407.505.4680 or jmchindamo@mdwcg.com. << /P 10 0 R 236 0 obj /K [9] /P 10 0 R /S /Footnote Originally developed by a group of trial attorneys, this handbook on civil discovery practice in the United States District Court, Middle District of Florida, updated in 2001, and again in 2015, attempts to supplement the rules and decisions by capturing this custom and practice. 42 0 obj 222 0 obj /S /P /Type /StructElem /P 462 0 R /Pg 13 0 R 244 0 obj 64 0 R 65 0 R 66 0 R 67 0 R 68 0 R 69 0 R 70 0 R 71 0 R] /Type /Page /Type /Page /K [5] /K [33] /Type /StructElem /P 10 0 R 70 0 obj endobj /P 10 0 R 61 0 obj /S /P endobj /Type /StructElem /S /P 1 0 obj << << /S /P /Type /StructElem /P 10 0 R /Pg 14 0 R %%EOF 1.1: Collins Collins Muir + Stewart LLP, 1999 Harrison Street, Suite 1700, Oakland, California 94612; (510) 844-5100. 39 0 obj /K [17] << /S /P /Pg 18 0 R OBJECTIONS. /Chartsheet /Part /K [3] /Type /StructElem >> 7 [109 0 R 110 0 R 111 0 R 112 0 R 113 0 R 114 0 R 286 0 R] 218 0 obj /A 465 0 R endobj /S /P /A 457 0 R /Type /StructElem << endobj /Type /StructElem /P 10 0 R /S /P << /K [8] >> << << /K [31] /P 10 0 R /K [5] 116 0 obj /Group 419 0 R /K [480 0 R 302 0 R] 184 0 obj 46 0 R 47 0 R 48 0 R 49 0 R 50 0 R 51 0 R 52 0 R 53 0 R 54 0 R 55 0 R >> >> /P 472 0 R /P 10 0 R /Type /StructElem 0000177393 00000 n << /Group 329 0 R Some plaintiff attorneys have adapted to the Nucci decision and now argue that, at most, the opinion only permits discovery identical to that discussed in Nuccisocial media photographs preceding a date of loss by no more than two years. /Pg 34 0 R << /StructParents 20 /Pg 29 0 R << /P 472 0 R endobj << /Type /StructElem hbbd``b`z$g7 /Type /StructElem /Resources 378 0 R /S /P endobj /S /P Nonspecific objections do not comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or the Local Rules and will not be sustained by this Court. /K [13] 0000014306 00000 n /K [4] /K [6] >> /S /P endobj endobj /Pg 28 0 R /P 10 0 R endobj stream endobj /P 10 0 R /K [1] >> /Group 324 0 R /Tabs /S >> /Pg 23 0 R 114 0 obj /Resources 333 0 R /K [0] endobj /S /P 74 0 obj /K [7] /Type /Page /S /P 75 0 obj Enter to open, tab to navigate, enter to select, https://content.next.westlaw.com/practical-law/document/Ia9defb5505ba11ecbea4f0dc9fb69570/Interrogatories-Responding-to-Interrogatories-FL?viewType=FullText&transitionType=Default&contextData=(sc.Default), Interrogatories: Responding to Interrogatories (FL). endobj /S /P Microsoft Word 20162018-06-21T14:53:54-05:002019-05-06T13:37:58-04:00 /S /P /P 10 0 R endobj >> /S /P /K [12] 231 0 obj /K [13] P. 1.340(b). /Type /StructElem /K [1] In a thorough opinion that cited to and adopted reasoning from courts across the country, the Fourth District denied the plaintiffs petition for certiorari and upheld the trial courts order. << 0000052244 00000 n endobj /P 476 0 R /Pg 20 0 R >> 324 0 obj >> >> /Pg 15 0 R /K [2] /P 10 0 R >> endobj /K [468 0 R] endobj endobj >> /P 10 0 R 279 0 obj /K 26 /Pg 14 0 R 176 0 obj /S /P << endobj 320 0 R 225 0 R 226 0 R 227 0 R 228 0 R 229 0 R 230 0 R 231 0 R 232 0 R 233 0 R] /P 476 0 R /MediaBox [0 0 607.0200195312 795.4799804688] 277 0 obj /Type /Page /K [0] /P 10 0 R /Type /Page >> << 205 0 R 206 0 R 207 0 R 208 0 R 209 0 R 210 0 R 211 0 R 212 0 R 213 0 R 214 0 R >> endobj /Type /StructElem /K [6] /K [15] /S /P /P 10 0 R endobj 297 0 obj /P 10 0 R /Type /StructElem endobj /Annots [] /Resources 343 0 R << endobj 143 0 obj /S /P << /S /P << /P 472 0 R 186 0 obj /Pg 34 0 R >> /K [20] << /K [18] 50 0 obj << << /K [11] /Type /StructElem The interrogatory seeks premature disclosure of expert opinion in violation of Code of Civil Procedure sections 2034.210, 2034.220, and 2034.270. 83 0 obj endobj >> /Pg 13 0 R endobj >> /P 10 0 R >> >> /S /P /Contents [345 0 R 346 0 R 347 0 R] 291 0 obj << /K [9] /K [0] /Pg 13 0 R An interrogatory may ask for an opinion or contention that relates to fact or the application of law to fact, or that asks for information not within the personal knowledge of the party. >> P. 1.340 (a). /Pg 14 0 R /Pg 34 0 R /S /P /S /P endobj endobj /P 10 0 R /S /P /P 10 0 R /Pg 34 0 R /S /P >> /Pg 13 0 R /Pg 16 0 R 313 0 obj /StructParents 2 /K [25] /K [3] /Contents [395 0 R 396 0 R 397 0 R] >> /P 10 0 R /K [22] >> P. 1.340(c). /K [36] /Pg 15 0 R /S /P /Type /StructElem If the defendant has surveillance films or Facebook posts of your client and wants to use them as evidence, they must be disclosed AFTER the plaintiff's deposition. /P 10 0 R /K [30] /S /P Form 1 - GENERAL PERSONAL INJURY NEGLIGENCE - INTERROGATORIES TO PLAINTIFF. /Type /StructElem /Tabs /S /Type /StructElem 244 0 R 245 0 R 246 0 R 247 0 R 248 0 R 249 0 R 250 0 R 251 0 R 252 0 R 253 0 R 165 0 obj 098595 Attorneys Ad Litem for the minor Offices at Grand Bay Plaza 2665 Bayshore Drive Suite 220-14 Miami, Florida 33133 Telephone: 305-373-3101 Facsimile: 305-381-8734 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been served via << 18 [202 0 R 203 0 R 204 0 R 205 0 R 206 0 R 207 0 R 208 0 R 209 0 R 210 0 R 211 0 R] /Type /StructElem /StructParents 11 /S /P /Type /StructElem /Tabs /S /Pg 15 0 R /Type /StructElem << 255 0 obj /K [10] :Fx)QP/IZ}:&_M)u"; _PB:8#\j*D2#flIc.TJsrrq2. << /Tabs /S /K [11] /Parent 6 0 R /Type /StructElem /P 473 0 R /Type /StructElem << endobj 1 [270 0 R 271 0 R 272 0 R 273 0 R 274 0 R 275 0 R 276 0 R 277 0 R 278 0 R 279 0 R /Pg 34 0 R endobj /P 10 0 R 248 0 obj x\[O~G?t^i7 d59!>d @l2}I"WU]rN;at vvz>[,fq:q2-&9 48 Ic|||'2=>:^1Gn /MediaBox [0 0 607.0200195312 795.4799804688] /Type /StructElem /Annots [] /S /P /Type /StructElem General or blanket objections should be used only when they apply to every request. >> /S /P 310 0 obj /Group 359 0 R >> /Type /StructElem 59 0 obj 66 0 obj endobj A Practice Note discussing how to draft and serve a response to interrogatories in a Florida circuit court civil case. /Contents [375 0 R 376 0 R 377 0 R] << hb```FB ea8$$zPi@ &+on;00\?L\`h`h`16k@@0*33d1L5\ "uZ#&4l >> /S /P /Pg 18 0 R >> /Type /StructElem /S /P /K [4] For reprints, contacttamontemuro@mdwcg.com. 305 0 obj #"4H$ _p \BE69 $"*C^_r wI='o*A01o%A%2x^18!3]=$x:0/"vKbUe|^b8E1#S D Gf^>#z_BF\T *DFhQ H$R!UsF%'X['Rad+I7b*:iYtd8I^\}=q&>LE4. 15 0 obj /Pg 31 0 R >> << 66 0 R 67 0 R 68 0 R 69 0 R 70 0 R 71 0 R 72 0 R 73 0 R 74 0 R 75 0 R 265 0 obj 284 0 R 285 0 R] /S /P /Pg 29 0 R /K [1] /P 10 0 R endobj << >> << /K [35] /K [32] 111 0 obj 20 [215 0 R 216 0 R 293 0 R 218 0 R 219 0 R] endobj endobj /P 10 0 R When an answer is narrowed by one or more objections, this fact and the nature of the information withheld should be specified in the response itself. /S /LBody <>/Metadata 14 0 R/OutputIntents[<>]/Pages 8 0 R/StructTreeRoot 16 0 R/Type/Catalog/Names 71 0 R>> 169 0 obj /S /P 263 0 obj /K [2] endobj /Resources 403 0 R /Pg 17 0 R << endobj >> /K [31] >> /S /P 0000000914 00000 n << /A 463 0 R 319 0 obj >> /Pg 19 0 R /Filter /FlateDecode >> /P 10 0 R 208 0 obj /Pg 17 0 R << /Resources 428 0 R /P 10 0 R /Pg 13 0 R /P 10 0 R Blanket, unsupported objections that a discovery 75 0 obj 65 0 obj /Pg 34 0 R /K [4] /S /P Such objections do not comply with Local Rule 26.1(e)(2)(A), which provides that, when an objection is made to any interrogatory or sub-part thereof or to any document request under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 34, the objection shall state with specificity all grounds. /Macrosheet /Part 188 0 obj 160 0 obj << >> /P 10 0 R /S /P /Type /StructElem /Annots [] /S /P /Pg 34 0 R /P 468 0 R /K [1] l+-M2hPm c/n` lM# /Type /StructElem /Pg 30 0 R endobj /K [2] /S /P /Pg 34 0 R While seemingly still a modern marvel, social media as we know it today is actually entering its teenage years. << >> endobj << /S /P /MediaBox [0 0 607.0200195312 795.4799804688] /Pg 34 0 R /Type /StructElem 87 0 obj /S /P /K [5] >> endobj /S /P /S /P Despite its ubiquity, many peopleincluding plaintiffs in personal injury lawsuitscontinue to share information on their social media accounts that can be a boon to defense counsel but disastrous to their own claims. 306 0 obj /Type /StructElem >> endobj endobj << /P 476 0 R /S /P /S /P /Type /StructElem 76 0 obj /K [19] Use this At A Glance Guide to learn the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure related to responding to interrogatoriesin Florida Circuit Courts. /S /P /IDTree 9 0 R endobj /P 473 0 R /K [21] << /K [8] >> This Standard Document has integrated notes with important explanations on how to draft common interrogatories used in Florida litigation and the usual defined terms and instructions. /Type /StructElem /P 10 0 R /MediaBox [0 0 607.0200195312 795.4799804688] /MediaBox [0 0 607.0200195312 795.4799804688] /Type /StructElem Cal. /P 36 0 R Northeast Florida State University from September 1999 to May 2003. 136 0 obj <>stream 79 0 obj >> As computerized translations, some words may be translated incorrectly. /P 10 0 R /Type /StructElem /S /LBody >> /Parent 6 0 R endobj /P 10 0 R /Annots [] /A 455 0 R 0c$Q&18r1>O~M =(uS%#+6%P"s1VBddsMq8zBp9\T`Ucm2Ktei{1*["ev4R1fFE#c\OhC!q{e?q 0R'$ o(95 207 0 obj /Pg 18 0 R 16 0 obj /P 472 0 R << /P 10 0 R /Pg 17 0 R /MediaBox [0 0 607.0200195312 795.4799804688] /Pg 17 0 R endobj /Type /StructElem 18 0 obj 109 0 obj /P 10 0 R 0000007591 00000 n 110 0 obj << uuid:39348FAF-56C1-45B6-9267-1F93B3F12615uuid:39348FAF-56C1-45B6-9267-1F93B3F12615 189 0 obj /Pg 25 0 R 221 0 obj >> /CreationDate (D:20180621145354-05'00') Administrative Procedures for Electronic Filing (PDF), Handbook for Trial Jurors Serving in the United States District Courts (PDF), Plan for Qualification and Selection of Grand and Petit Jurors (PDF), VII. /Annots [] /P 10 0 R << /K [0] 269 0 obj /Pg 14 0 R /P 10 0 R 0000001255 00000 n endobj /P 10 0 R /K [9] 120 0 obj 22 321 0 R 23 322 0 R 24 323 0 R] << 311 0 obj /K [6] The total number of interrogatories to be propounded without leave of court must not exceed thirty (30), including all subparts. endobj /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem >> >> >> << >> >> /Contents [350 0 R 351 0 R 352 0 R] /P 10 0 R << /P 10 0 R >> << /Pg 34 0 R << as well as their objections and responses to discovery requests, are subject to Fla. Stat. endstream endobj 108 0 obj <. /S /P /S /L /Contents [410 0 R 411 0 R 412 0 R] /P 10 0 R /S /P /P 10 0 R endobj >> /P 10 0 R /MediaBox [0 0 607.0200195312 795.4799804688] >> /S /P l@Ad ? << << /Pg 20 0 R endobj /StructParents 13 /S /P /MediaBox [0 0 607.0200195312 795.4799804688] >> /P 472 0 R << endobj << /K [4] /Group 404 0 R /Pg 25 0 R /K [1] /Type /StructElem >> /Type /StructElem endobj endobj /K [3] /P 10 0 R 134 0 obj /S /P << /Type /StructElem 155 0 R 156 0 R 157 0 R 158 0 R 159 0 R 160 0 R 161 0 R 162 0 R 163 0 R 164 0 R /S /P endobj /Type /StructElem /S /Footnote /ID [<35422D32342D38432D41352D35462D31>] /Length 483 0 R /Group 349 0 R /K [5] /K [11] /Pg 14 0 R >> /S /P << I. /S /P /Type /StructElem /K [2] endobj >> /Pg 26 0 R hWmo6:87q8`7 {m.hy+KDfHI](. /Contents [400 0 R 401 0 R 402 0 R] /Pg 17 0 R /Pg 13 0 R << /Type /StructElem << /P 10 0 R >> 0000002693 00000 n /K [37] /S /P endobj /MarkInfo 2 0 R "Objection. /S /P /Pg 34 0 R << /K [9] endobj /Pg 27 0 R endobj /Type /StructElem /P 10 0 R 179 0 obj notice of serving plaintiff's answers to defendant uff's second set of interrogatories directed to plaintiff /Pg 27 0 R << /K [8] /S /P /Pg 13 0 R /Type /StructElem /Pg 16 0 R 34 0 obj >> /Type /StructElem << 21 0 obj endobj >> M i c r o s o f t W o r d 2 0 1 6; modified using iText 2.1.7 by 1T3XT /P 10 0 R /K [7] trailer << /Type /StructElem 102 0 obj /P 10 0 R 139 0 obj << /Type /StructElem << endobj /Marked true >> /P 450 0 R 6 and Document Request No. 259 0 obj /S /P >> >> 76 0 R 77 0 R 78 0 R 79 0 R 80 0 R 81 0 R 82 0 R 83 0 R 84 0 R 85 0 R >> << /S /Table /Pg 27 0 R /Pg 29 0 R /P 10 0 R /K [0] /K [7] /Type /StructElem endobj /P 10 0 R >> /Type /StructElem >> endobj /Type /StructElem endobj /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem >> /Parent 6 0 R endobj /S /P << /P 478 0 R 234 0 obj >> /S /P /P 10 0 R /MediaBox [0 0 607.0200195312 795.4799804688] Absent compelling circumstances, failure to assert objections to an interrogatory within the time for answers constitutes a waiver and will preclude a party from asserting the objection in a response to a motion to compel. >> /Type /StructElem endobj << /S /P 96 0 R 97 0 R 98 0 R 99 0 R 100 0 R 101 0 R 102 0 R 103 0 R 104 0 R 105 0 R endobj 58 16 0000123483 00000 n /P 10 0 R /Annotation /Sect /S /P /Type /StructElem << /K [3] /K [11] endobj 0000004654 00000 n << << 238 0 obj endobj stream 128 0 obj /K [6] >> << /P 10 0 R << 175 0 obj << /Pg 22 0 R << /Type /StructElem /S /L /Producer /Parent 6 0 R >> Timothy J. Corrigan, Chief United States District Judge Elizabeth Warren, Clerk of Court. >> /Group 364 0 R endobj << 84 0 obj << /Type /StructElem This avoids drawing an objection from opposing counsel where the . /Pg 19 0 R /Pg 23 0 R /P 10 0 R /S /P /Type /StructElem /P 10 0 R 174 0 obj /ABCpdf 8123 /Tabs /S /P 451 0 R These "general objections" generally include claims that the discovery requests are: 1) overbroad; 2) burdensome; 3) not relevant nor likely to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; 4) not appropriately limited in time; 5) seek information protected by the attorney client and/or work product privilege; and 6) not limited to products or issues which are substantially similar to the . /K [16] /P 10 0 R 168 0 obj /P 471 0 R 112 0 obj /Type /StructElem for the southern district of florida james tracy, ) ) plaintiff, ) ) case no. /K [7] 275 0 obj >> /P 10 0 R /Pg 17 0 R 290 0 obj /MediaBox [0 0 607.0200195312 795.4799804688] /Pg 27 0 R /S /P /S /P 252 0 obj /P 10 0 R /S /P /Pg 18 0 R /Type /StructElem endobj << endobj << /K [2] 8 [115 0 R 116 0 R 117 0 R 118 0 R 119 0 R] /Type /Page /S /P >> << /S /P /Type /Page /S /P /K [1] /P 10 0 R /MediaBox [0 0 607.0200195312 795.4799804688] endobj 296 0 obj << /K [32] /Type /StructElem /Pg 16 0 R << /Type /StructElem >> endobj 187 0 obj Philadelphia, PA 19103, Defense Digest,Vol. But if are a plaintiff's lawyer, you must know this rule. /P 473 0 R /P 10 0 R /Type /StructElem << /S /P /K [2] /Pg 21 0 R /S /P /P 10 0 R /S /P For authorities updated in real time, please see the SmartRules Guide for the litigation document you are drafting. /K [14] /Type /StructElem /S /P endobj /Pg 18 0 R startxref /S /P >> << /S /Span /Pg 34 0 R endobj << 95 0 obj /K [460 0 R] /K [8] << >> /K [7] /Type /StructElem endobj /P 473 0 R << /P 321 0 R /P 475 0 R endobj /Footnote /Note /Type /StructElem /K [7] endobj /Type /StructElem >> << /Type /Page /StructParents 10 >> << << >> /Parent 6 0 R 0000052748 00000 n 46 0 obj /Pg 34 0 R >> >> >> /Pg 34 0 R /S /P /K [2] OBJECTIONS TO INTERROGATORIES The Respondent, Judge Linda D. Schoonover, by and through her undersigned counsel, files her Objections to the First Set of Interrogatories propounded by Special Counsel and says: Objection. Objections to portions of a document request do not excuse the responding party from producing those documents to which there is no objection. /StructParents 21 /K [6] 141 0 obj /MediaBox [0 0 607.0200195312 795.4799804688] /Tabs /S /Type /StructElem nn4L^>|p0#~o#|g<fOM?](O9b_hUIWKe2I37&$$8i=BNfOeopT,.N! >> 237 0 obj /K [0] /Type /StructElem /P 10 0 R /P 472 0 R /StructParents 18 /P 464 0 R >> >> /Type /Page /P 10 0 R 17 0 obj << /Group 384 0 R 82 0 obj /K [1] endobj 127 0 obj /Pg 28 0 R /K [3] /Pg 26 0 R /Pg 25 0 R /Type /StructElem 292 0 obj 262 0 obj /Type /StructElem endobj /Parent 6 0 R /P 10 0 R << Fla. R. Civ. endobj Form 2 - GENERAL PERSONAL INJURY NEGLIGENCE - INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT. /S /P Notice of Removal in the United States District Courts At A Glance, Case Management Statement in the United States District CourtAt A Glance. 88 0 obj /K [1] 8 0 obj 153 0 obj /K [10] 1, March 2018, Responding to Social Media Discovery Objections. /Tabs /S /P 10 0 R /K [5] /Pg 17 0 R endobj endobj /K [27] /Type /StructElem << This Note addresses the duty to search for responsive information, who must respond to interrogatories, the types of responses that the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure permit, and the service and filing requirements for interrogatories. /Type /StructElem /P 474 0 R /Pg 33 0 R << 121 0 obj /Pg 19 0 R /P 454 0 R endobj /Type /StructElem >> >> /Pg 16 0 R 127 0 obj <>/Filter/FlateDecode/ID[<7DD03834BE9A944CAF0E37776813323A><18B09DF8875632499EC042FF89B6BD03>]/Index[107 30]/Info 106 0 R/Length 97/Prev 120659/Root 108 0 R/Size 137/Type/XRef/W[1 3 1]>>stream >> >> The disputed discovery requests are Interrogatories 2-7, 12, 13, and 18, and Document Requests 12, 25-27, and 39. << /K [3] /Pg 32 0 R 0 << 60 0 obj<>stream /Length 12 0 R /Pg 31 0 R /P 472 0 R /S /P /S /P endobj endobj /Size 113 /Prev 323787 /S /LBody 0000007100 00000 n /Type /StructElem << endobj 0000001926 00000 n /Type /StructElem endobj >> << In 1994, the Trial Lawyers Section of The Florida Bar, the Conference of Circuit Judges, and the Conference of County Court Judges formed a joint committee to provide a forum for the exchange of ideas on how to improve the day- to-day practice of law for trial lawyers and trial judges. << >> Generalized assertions of privilege will be rejected. /K [0] /Parent 6 0 R /Type /StructElem << /K [37 0 R 38 0 R 39 0 R 40 0 R 41 0 R 42 0 R 43 0 R 44 0 R 35 0 R 45 0 R 225 0 R 226 0 R 227 0 R 228 0 R 229 0 R 230 0 R 231 0 R 232 0 R 233 0 R] >> /Tabs /S endobj << /StructParents 7 /S /P endobj >> RESPONSE TO FORM INTERROGATORY NO. /Pg 13 0 R /Pg 16 0 R /Type /StructElem 11 [131 0 R 132 0 R 133 0 R 134 0 R] >> endobj 260 0 obj endobj << /P 10 0 R /Resources 363 0 R /Pg 34 0 R /S /P %PDF-1.6 % /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem 216 0 obj 4 0 obj 73 0 obj endobj /Creator >> /Type /StructElem /P 10 0 R << /K [6] 201 0 obj >> Interrogatories may be served on a defendant or any other party "with or after service of process and the . /Kids [13 0 R 14 0 R 15 0 R 16 0 R 17 0 R 18 0 R 19 0 R 20 0 R 21 0 R 22 0 R << /P 10 0 R << /K [4] 101 0 obj /K [20] 0000006573 00000 n /P 10 0 R /Type /StructElem << << /Type /StructElem /P 10 0 R 81 0 obj /K [2] 203 0 obj >> Please keep this in mind if you use this service for this website. For more detailed information, please see the SmartRules Response to Interrogatory Guide for the court where your action is pending. /Type /StructElem >> /Pg 19 0 R /Pg 13 0 R 2 [44 0 R 45 0 R 283 0 R 47 0 R 48 0 R 49 0 R 50 0 R 51 0 R 52 0 R 53 0 R /K [2] << hbbd```b``z"gIil &Sb`2,`rL`L*dPL@A@H'@ 8 Co., 88 A.D.3d 617 (N.Y. App. /Type /StructElem 29 0 obj >> Hp@eR $&=bR@\e qo#g p), /P 10 0 R /P 444 0 R /P 35 0 R 9 [120 0 R 121 0 R 122 0 R 123 0 R 124 0 R 125 0 R] /S /LBody endobj The trial court ultimately compelled the plaintiff to produce, among other things, all photographs associated with the account for the two years prior to the incident to the present. ATTORNEY ADVERTISING pursuant to New York RPC 7.1. /P 10 0 R /Type /StructElem /Pg 21 0 R /Pg 13 0 R /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem << << /K [3] 229 0 obj endobj 49 0 obj 387 (E.D. /P 472 0 R /Pg 32 0 R /Type /StructElem >> /P 10 0 R /Group 369 0 R /Type /StructElem /K [29] /S /P /Type /StructElem /Pg 15 0 R /K [15] << 270 0 obj OBJECTIONS: Relevance. << 156 0 obj All grounds for an objection must be stated with specificity. 210 0 obj /Pg 33 0 R << /Pg 13 0 R << /S /P /Type /StructElem /Pg 34 0 R /S /P << 72 0 obj /Pg 34 0 R /S /P /P 10 0 R 0000008012 00000 n 177 0 obj It is duplicative of Form Interrogatory 3.1 which was served by Madera Framing on November 24, 2015 and responded to on January 15, 2016, by Responding Party. 130 0 obj /Annots [] << /Diagram /Figure << /S /P /P 10 0 R /P 10 0 R << /P 10 0 R /Pg 27 0 R /Tabs /S /P 10 0 R /K [9] /K [7] >> /Type /StructElem /Resources 373 0 R A sample set of interrogatories that may be used in a Florida circuit court civil case. /P 10 0 R endobj 276 0 obj endobj /Type /StructElem endobj 283 0 obj /Type /StructElem >> << /K [5] >> /DisplayDocTitle true endobj >> endobj /Type /StructElem /S /P Enter to open, tab to navigate, enter to select, Practical Law Standard Document w-032-8526, https://content.next.westlaw.com/practical-law/document/Ifc45d63a22db11ecbea4f0dc9fb69570/Interrogatories-FL?viewType=FullText&transitionType=Default&contextData=(sc.Default). /Type /StructElem /P 474 0 R /Type /StructElem << 24, No. endobj /S /L >> /S /P /S /P >> 164 0 obj /S /P District of Florida, copies of written interrogatories, answers and objections to interrogatories, notices of oral depositions, transcripts of oral depositions, requests for the production of documents and other things, responses to requests for production, matters disclosed pursuant to Rule 26(a)(1), Federal Rules of Civil /K [11] << 53 0 obj << 6 0 obj 33 0 R 34 0 R] >> 33 0 obj endobj /K [5] /Parent 6 0 R /P 10 0 R endobj /K [12] /Type /Metadata >> /Pg 27 0 R /K [5] >> >> /Parent 6 0 R >> 12, to which DSNB claims it /K [2] /Type /StructElem endobj /P 446 0 R /Pg 34 0 R Summary Judgment vs Summary Adjudication What is the Difference? >> 57 0 obj endobj endobj endobj 232 0 obj /Pg 14 0 R 1. /Annots [] >> 23 0 obj /S /P /S /P >> /K [10] >> /Pg 16 0 R endobj /Contents [415 0 R 416 0 R 417 0 R] /K [10] << Is Google Responsible for Terrorist Attacks. Form 3 - MEDICAL MALPRACTICE - INTERROGATORIES TO PLAINTIFF. /Type /StructElem << /S /P /Type /StructElem /StructParents 17 303.1: Objection. /Pg 14 0 R << /S /P /P 10 0 R /K [1] ATTORNEY ADVERTISING pursuant to New York RPC 7.1 /K [15] /Pg 16 0 R /Parent 6 0 R /Pg 29 0 R /Pg 34 0 R /Pg 30 0 R /K [0] /Pg 18 0 R /K [0] /S /P /K 25 endobj /Type /StructElem endobj /P 10 0 R /K [2] endobj /Contents [430 0 R 431 0 R 432 0 R] /S /P endobj 146 0 obj endobj >> /S /P /S /P /S /P endobj 118 0 obj 309 0 obj << /S /P << endobj /S /P /Type /Page /Pg 33 0 R /Type /StructElem << /Type /StructElem <]>> /S /P endobj 250 0 obj << %PDF-1.6 % /P 473 0 R 32 0 obj << 152 0 obj Ten interrogatories, including subparts, may be sent to a party, in addition to the standard interrogatories contained in Florida Family Law Rules of Procedure Form 12.930 (b) or Florida Family Law Rules of Procedure Form 12.930 (c). << /Type /StructElem /P 10 0 R 239 0 obj /Pg 22 0 R >> /ITXT (2.1.7) /Pg 21 0 R /S /P >> All Rights Reserved. /Pg 33 0 R << << endobj endobj %PDF-1.5 13 [144 0 R 288 0 R 146 0 R 147 0 R 148 0 R 149 0 R 150 0 R 151 0 R 289 0 R 153 0 R] endobj << /S /P /K [19] endobj 3 0 obj /P 10 0 R >> /P 10 0 R /K [38] 107 0 R 108 0 R] /Pg 32 0 R /P 472 0 R /Pg 15 0 R A party may propound to another party thirty (30) interrogatories, including those from the official forms or custom drafted ones. P. 1.280(b); Fla. R. Civ. /Type /Page endobj 0000004751 00000 n endobj >> >> /S /P 2 0 obj /P 472 0 R 310 0 R 311 0 R 312 0 R 313 0 R 314 0 R 315 0 R 316 0 R 317 0 R 318 0 R 319 0 R endobj >> /Pg 20 0 R /Type /StructElem /K [8] endobj /Type /StructElem /P 477 0 R >> << <>/Metadata 338 0 R/ViewerPreferences 339 0 R>> /Type /StructElem 0000005561 00000 n endobj endobj /P 479 0 R 2018 Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin. >> /P 10 0 R << >> /Pg 31 0 R 655 0 obj <> endobj 91 0 obj endstream endobj startxref << << 86 0 obj /Type /StructElem endobj /P 477 0 R 11 0 obj /Type /StructElem /S /P >> 326 0 obj /Endnote /Note >> << 9 0 obj /S /P /Type /StructElem endobj /P 476 0 R /Contents [335 0 R 336 0 R 337 0 R] /Pg 19 0 R xc```g``[d 6+Chddv]0 (!BAA4A(9z7jF6 /S /P [1] /K [4] 103 0 obj P. 1.340(a). << /Type /StructElem /K [6] 2000 Market Street, Suite 2300 << /K [466 0 R] /K 28 >> << /Type /StructElem /K [2] 122 0 obj 205 0 obj /Pg 34 0 R << 162 0 obj /S /P A Practice Note discussing how to draft and serve a response to interrogatories in a Florida circuit court civil case. And social medias footprint is ever-expandingas of the third quarter of 2017, Facebook had more than 2 billion monthly active users, up from 1 billion in 2012. /K [11] /MediaBox [0 0 607.0200195312 795.4799804688] x[[s~OUVj[THdwr9=aflnI$e%nZ|UQ>IC1$N* /S /P /S /P endobj << 108 0 obj << /Pg 29 0 R /Pg 25 0 R /S /P /S /P >> endobj /K [1] /K [284 0 R 285 0 R] >> /P 10 0 R Rule 1.340 (a) provides the following with regard to the timing for submitting and responding to interrogatories. /P 10 0 R /S /P 23 0 R 24 0 R 25 0 R 26 0 R 27 0 R 28 0 R 29 0 R 30 0 R 31 0 R 32 0 R >> /Annots [] /Pg 20 0 R /P 10 0 R >> << 100 0 obj /Pg 34 0 R /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem /Annots [] /K [13] >> 199 0 obj /Workbook /Document See Patterson v. Turner Constr. /S /P 245 0 obj 227 0 obj >> endobj /S /Transparency << /K [9] /Annots [] >> >> /K [0] 0000175500 00000 n 0000007029 00000 n /Pg 26 0 R /S /P >> /Parent 6 0 R /Type /StructElem << /Type /StructElem endobj /Pg 13 0 R /S /LBody 5 0 obj >> /S /P << /K [12] << A party and counsel ordinarily have complied with their obligation to respond to interrogatories if they have: Responded to the interrogatories within the time set by the governing rule, stipulation, or court-ordered extension; Conducted a reasonable inquiry, including a review of documents likely to have information necessary to respondto interrogatories; Objected specifically to objectionable interrogatories; Submitted the answers under oath, signed by the appropriate party representative.

Armoury Crate No Fan Control, Articles S